2021 - Fabrizio Serra Editore
Article
Digital Version
Streaming uniquement | Téléchargement indisponible | Copier/coller indisponible | Imprimer indisponible
Response to Valentina Erasmo's comment
139-141 p.
Fait partie de
History of economic ideas : XXIX, 3, 2021-
Informations
Code DOI : 10.19272/202106103010
ISSN: 1724-2169
-
Dans le même fichier
- The organic composition of capital and technological unemployment : Marx's and Ricardo's intellectual debt to John Barton and George Ramsay
- Edgeworth's Figure 1 and the 'Complicated double adjustment' : labour exchange, production and remuneration
- Research strategies of Paretian economists in the Interwar period in Italy
- Keynes's Treatise on Probability at 100 : a Symposium : introduction
- Keynes's Uncertainty as a tragic rational dilemma
- A comment on Anna Carabelli's Keynes's Uncertainty as a tragic rational dilemma
- Response to Carlo Zappia's comment
- Keynes's Treatise on probability 100 years later : small vs. large worlds and closed vs. open systems
- Re-Reading the Treatise : history will matter (again) in Economics : a comment on John B. Davis
- Response to Valentina Erasmo's comment
- Difficulties in the logical interpretation of probability
- A comment on Donald Gillies's Difficulties in the logical interpretation of probability
- Response to Carlo Zappia's comment
- Keynes's Treatise on probability at 100 years : its most enduring message
- Alternative approaches and a priori limits to mathematical modelling in Economics : a comment on Carlo Zappia's Keynes's Treatise on probability at 100 Years : its most enduring message
- Response to Zeid Al Kaffaf's comment
- Why you should read classical Economic theory and the modern Economy : a response to James Ahiakpor
- Steven Kates on Why you should read classical Economic theory and the modern Economy : a rejoinder
- Book reviews
