2017 - Franco Angeli
Articolo
Versione Digitale
Download | Copia/incolla | Stampa
Political power vs natural laws : Physiocracy and slavery
67-85 p.
- As we know, there are two basic elements in the Physiocrats' view: on the juridical plane, the belief that positive laws follow natural ones; on the economic plane, the idea that agriculture is the sole source of net product. The importance and interdependence of these two aspects also emerge with reference to the issue of slave labour and to the debate concerning its abolition. This article attempts to inquire into the ambiguities of the economic ideas of the Physiocrats, who, in theory, favored the use of free labour, but in practice were forced, out of political realism, to accept slave labor - even though it was seen as the outcome of a "sick" law. In particular, we will show that Le Mercier de la Rivière and Pierre Poivre, Physiocrats and colonial Intendants, gave up to the idea of the abolition of slavery, thus legitimising its continuation. [Publisher's Text].
Fa parte di
History of Economic Thought and Policy : 1, 2017-
Informazioni
Codice DOI: 10.3280/SPE2017-001003
ISSN: 2280-188X
PAROLE CHIAVE
- Slavery, Free Labor, Physiocracy, Le Mercier de la Rivière, Pierre Poivre
-
Nello stesso fascicolo
- At the origin of the notion of creative goods in economics : Scitovsky and Hawtrey
- A Universal Allowance to all Citizens : Juliet Rhys-Williams' Alternative to The Beveridge Plan
- Political power vs natural laws : Physiocracy and slavery
- Antoine de Monchrestien and Antonio Serra : two founders of political economy
- Antoine de Montchrétien and development economics
- Useful and honourable : notes towards a philosophy of political economy in the Traicté
- Book reviews
- On a Recent Evolution of Relevant Sources in the History of Economic Thought