De Finetti and Savage on the Normative Relevance of Imprecise Reasoning: a Reply to Arthmar and Brady

211-223 p.

• Informationen

  DOI: 10.19272/201706101009

  ISSN: 1724-2169

  Permalink: http://digital.casalini.it/10.19272/201706101009
• In derselben Datei

  • What do Players Know? : Nash Equilibrium and Cournot's Anticipation of the Adaptive Interpretation
  • Ethical Transformation and Government of the Self in Keynes's Economic System
  • German Historicism in North America : a New Review of Materials from Henry Walcott Farnam and Jack Carroll Myles
  • Social Economy in Nineteenth-Century France
  • The Social Economy of Constantin Pecqueur (1801-1887) : a Little Known Contribution to the Critique of Liberal Political Economy in 19th Century France
  • Association, Mutualism, and Corporate Form in the Published and Unpublished Writings of Pierre-Joseph Proudhon
  • Persistent Confusions about Walras's Conception of Social Economy
  • From Gide to Desroche, from Cooperation to Utopia: Two Different Interpretations of Charles Fourier
  • De Finetti and Savage on the Normative Relevance of Imprecise Reasoning: a Reply to Arthmar and Brady
  • De Finetti-Savage's and Keynes-Knight's Approaches to Probability and Uncertainty: a Rejoinder to Feduzi, Runde and Zappia
  • A Peircean Perspective on Path Dependence in Economics : a Review Essay on Altug Yalcintas, Intellectual Path Dependence in Economics: Why Economists Do Not Reject Refuted Theories
  • The (Somewhat?) Shaky Theoretical Foundations of Modern Macroeconomics : a Review Article of Michel De Vroey, A History of Macroeconomics from Keynes to Lucas and Beyond
  • Book reviews